In many parts of rural Kenya and other parts of the world, people rely on collecting drinking water from community water points, typically with 20 L plastic jerry cans. Even though the water may have been safe for consumption at the point of collection, it is prone to recontamination during transport to and storage in the individual households, especially in environments with hygienically critical conditions. Biofilms that grow inside these plastic containers and poor water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) conditions can lead to recontamination.
ChlorinationChlorination is a water treatment strategy that provides residual disinfection, reducing recontamination risks during transport and storage. Because studies have found that users’ compliance with chlorinating water in the household can be inadequate, installing a chlorinator at the point of collection would circumvent the need to establish user compliance. This would also increase the proportion of safe chlorinated water available for consumption.
Producing and testing two kinds of chlorinators at EawagAlthough passive chlorinators are available in markets and stores worldwide, their operation and maintenance costs are often prohibitive and limit their use. Locally produced chlorinators can be a good alternative. This Safe Water Promotion research group project constructed and tested two different types of chlorinators at Eawag, the Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology. These tests were successful and were replicated in Kenya.
The installation of the tap-attached AkvoTur was the fastest and the easiest. It was robust, easy to operate and had a dosage consistency of 69%. The T-chlorinator, however, had a better overall performance. Even though it was more complicated to fabricate and install, it was more robust and had a higher dosage consistency (89%) if automatic drainage was available. The automatic drainage ensures that the water can drain from the T-chlorinator by gravity.